Building 7 Thickens 9/11's Epistemological Plot

Are you aware that Building 7’s destruction has raised serious questions? Have you realized that these go beyond the specifics of Building 7’s structural failure and reach all the way to the integrity of the mass media? Would you like to probe them deeper? If so, read on. If not, consider finding reasons to come back here, perhaps by visiting this web’s introductory page to 9/11 Truth.

Building 7’s structural failure is highly enigmatic: it is odd that its official video model matches poorly the actual video evidence that a controlled demolition video matches very well. More disturbingly, although this information easily lends itself to a short, inexpensive, simple, and highly informative documentary, not a single TV network worldwide has offered it.

There are many ways to apprehend this epistemological conundrum, the most straightforward of which is to review the specifics of Building 7’s structural failure. This exercise is best left to the de facto authority on Building 7, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), who has established that Building 7’s failure was caused by a controlled demolition, as the video evidence suggests, and contrary to the official report. Behold the synthetic diagram of their analysis:

 

For a comprehensive demonstration, kindly explore AE911Truth’s slide show or comparable materials. Within the scope of this web page, suffice to notice the use of a well-honed version of the scientific method:

The results of AE911Truth’s exploration of Building 7’s destruction can be fairly summarized as follows:

They lead to paradigm-shifting conclusions:

This leads us to your next 9/11 action item:

AE911Truth’s analysis of Building 7’s disintegration solves the video discrepancy that may have led you here. However, it does not put to rest the epistemological enigma that it exposed. Au contraire, it expands it into the intense mystery of a worldwide and persisting conspiracy by the mass media to censor Building 7’s controlled demolition and uncovers an extremely serious breach of morality on their part. While AE911Truth deserves gratitude for making the public aware of it, this problem begs for a solution.

There are many ways to explore the dramatic implications of the global and enduring censorship of Building 7’s controlled demolition. The most straightforward of them is arguably a critical review of its sister event, which happens to be the core of the 9/11 terror attacks: the spectacularly morbid structural failures of the twin towers with over 2,000 civilians and rescuers inside them.

Love,

Dan Noël, 2011-March-19