The Twin Towers Set 9/11's Epistemological Question

Do you know that the U.S. government hid—rather clumsily—Building 7’s controlled demolition? Are you aware of the global and enduring censorship imposed by the mass media on this cover-up? Would you like to probe it deeper? If so, read on. If not, consider finding reasons to come back here, perhaps by visiting this web’s Building 7 page.

As much as the controlled demolition of a high-rise, even as large as Building 7, does not deserve much worry, its cover-up by the U.S. government is very disturbing. Since this cover-up has been sloppy by any standard, its ensuing de facto near-absolute censorship by the mass media is outright alarming.

There are many ways to tackle this epistemological plot, the most straightforward of which is to review an event similar in place, time and magnitude to Building 7’s demolition but dramatically different for its highly emotional connotation: the twin towers’ structural failure. This exercise is best left to the de facto authority on the twin towers, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). It so happens that AE911Truth has established that the twin towers, like Building 7, were destroyed by controlled demolitions, with two notable technical deviations from the regular process:

Behold the synthetic diagram of their analysis:

For a comprehensive demonstration, kindly explore AE911Truth’s slide show or comparable materials. Within the scope of this web page, suffice to notice the use of a well-honed version of the scientific method:

The results of AE911Truth’s exploration of the twin towers’ destruction can be fairly summarized as follows:

They immediately vindicate 9/11 Truth:

They lead to paradigm-shifting conclusions in the areas of global terrorism and counterterrorism:

But the juiciest conclusions, like on Building 7, are epistemological:

This leads us to your next 9/11 action item:

AE911Truth’s analysis of the twin towers’ explosive demolitions provides important information. However, it does not put to rest the epistemological plot that Building 7’s censorship exposed. Au contraire, it expands it into the baffling question as to how literally tens of thousands of watchdogs of very different types all over the world would somehow conspire to censor the cover and protection the U.S. government granted the most formidable terrorists in history.

This is precisely the fundamental teaching of 9/11: the morbidly spectacular controlled demolitions of the twin towers have served as the pretext for many nefarious activities, first among them an open-ended war, they and their cover-up are evident, yet no watchdog of importance has voiced concern over this. This hints at a censorship of gargantuan proportions:

As such, the specifics of 9/11 matter much less than the mind-boggling epistemological questions they raise:

The discerning reader will concur that it is hard to think of more important questions than these. They turn 9/11 Truth into an overarching call to relentless investigation.

There are many paths to apprehend the ultimate ramifications of the 9/11 censorship, the most direct and pragmatic one being arguably found in the free Global Platonic Theater e-book.

Love,

Dan Noël, 2011-3-19